#Rule of rose violin series#

#Rule of rose violin series#

To further support this finding, Gladwell uses the example of the Beatles, who, early on in their career, landed a regular set of gigs in a series of strip clubs in Hamburg, Germany. Here, one can argue that it’s how much an individual practices that counts, not how much innate talent they have. Ericsson then repeated the study with the academy’s pianists and arrived at the same result. Those in the top tier had practiced a total of 10,000hours, those in the middle had practiced for 8,000 hours, and those in the bottom tier, 4,000.

Here, he grouped the school’s violinists into three tiers according to ability and asked each student how many hours of violin they had practiced throughout their lives. Anders Ericsson who conducted a study at Berlin’s Academy of Music. This finding was compounded by Psychologist K. However, the more they research this question, the more they realize preparation plays a big role in the formation of talent.

Psychologists have spent decades attempting to find out whether innate talent exists.

By grasping where successful people come from, we can begin to understand the logic of success. He argues that most successful individuals have benefited from hidden advantages and cultural legacies that encourage them to learn, work, and understand the world in a way others cannot. Yet, Gladwell believes this is an over-romanticized view of success. We often attribute success to personal attributes, believing that successful individuals rose from nothing to greatness.